Add test and code to handle the same case on deposits
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <[email protected]>
And syncs completely before proceeding Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <[email protected]>
> so now it always reports drift while CatchingUp and only when drift exceed 80% of unsynced policy while InSync
> this required to define an offline chain backend, which throws errors at any backend call but it has a hardcoded option of blockTime = 1
fix #2507 We had a user report where the user is confused about the deposit that was not coming through and the reason was missing script utxo in the API request for deposit. This PR introduces a check in the internal wallet that should provide more info for the users in this specific case of missing script. --- <!-- Consider each and tick it off one way or the other --> * [x] CHANGELOG updated or not needed * [x] Documentation updated or not needed * [x] Haddocks updated or not needed * [x] No new TODOs introduced or explained herafter